Lefkowitz
location 43 mentions 60% confidence
Also known as: LEFKOWITZ
Document Mentions (43)
| Document | Volume | Page | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| 059.pdf | - | 149 | imple assault on an airplane (18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(5), a six-month misdemeanor). Villafana reported that Lefkowitz "put in a pitch for only 12 months, I... |
| 059.pdf | - | 152 | ning towards a plea to state charges under a non-prosecution agreement, and she would be forwarding to Lefkowitz "our last version of the Non-Prosecut... |
| 059.pdf | - | 155 | t team with a note stating that it "contains the 18/12 split that Jay and Andy agreed to," and then to Lefkowitz. Regarding the prosecution of other i... |
| 059.pdf | - | 160 | he Miami office needed to review it. Villafana also alerted Lourie that she had spoken that morning to Lefkowitz, who "was waffling" about Epstein ple... |
| 059.pdf | - | 171 | NOT A CERTIFIED COPY However, as with Villafafia's publicly released emails to Lefkowitz, this meeting between Acosta and Lefkowitz drew criticism whe... |
| 059.pdf | - | 172 | sleading. Emails show that, immediately after the breakfast, Acosta phoned Sloman, who then emailed to Lefkowitz a revision to the Addendum language t... |
| 059.pdf | - | 174 | epresentative] at this point. Notwithstanding Acosta's assessment and prediction, after Sloman sent to Lefkowitz a new draft addendum and they spoke b... |
| 059.pdf | - | 175 | when he sought and obtained a plea hearing postponement from October 26 to November 20. Responding to Lefkowitz's attempts to limit the USAO's communi... |
| 059.pdf | - | 180 | eed to meet with Starr and other Epstein defense attorneys to discuss the defense complaints raised in Lefkowitz's December 11, 2007 submissions. 156 ... |
| 059.pdf | - | 187 | defense objected to USAO communications with the state authorities. In November 2007, Sloman noted to Lefkowitz, "Your recent correspondence attemptin... |
| 059.pdf | - | 188 | Whitley. Meanwhile, Oosterbaan's Deputy Chief drafted a decision letter to be sent from Oosterbaan to Lefkowitz, and over the course of several weeks,... |
| 059.pdf | - | 194 | d. 178 Sloman provided a draft of this letter to Acosta for his approval before the letter was sent to Lefkowitz. 113 |
| 059.pdf | - | 242 | y were scheduling the meeting. Shortly after the breakfast meeting, Sloman, in Miami, sent an email to Lefkowitz (copying Acosta and Villafana), notin... |
| 059.pdf | - | 243 | ta said during the breakfast meeting. Although OPR could not find evidence that the letter was sent to Lefkowitz, OPR nonetheless considers it persuas... |
| 059.pdf | - | 244 | ommunications, and consequently they did not reflect the full context of Villafana's communications to Lefkowitz. The redacted emails were later unsea... |
| 059.pdf | - | 292 | ants and their respective counsel in this matter."307 Shortly thereafter, Sloman drafted a response to Lefkowitz's letter, which Acosta revised to cla... |
| 059.pdf | - | 294 | encing or to provide a written statement for such a proceeding. In a November 30, 2007 reply letter to Lefkowitz, Acosta did not address the substance... |
| 059.pdf | - | 295 | iscuss this matter with Assistant Attorney General Fisher." The following day, Sloman sent a letter to Lefkowitz, with copies to Acosta and Villafana,... |
| 059.pdf | - | 297 | , state court proceeding involving the entry of a plea on state charges. In a letter from Villafana to Lefkowitz, responding to his allegations that s... |
| 059.pdf | - | 352 | ot clear that all federal victims would have been allowed to participate in the state plea hearing. In Lefkowitz's November 29, 2007 letter to Acosta,... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 94 | imple assault on an airplane (18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(5), a six-month misdemeanor). Villafaña reported that Lefkowitz “put in a pitch for only 12 months, I... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 97 | ning towards a plea to state charges under a non-prosecution agreement, and she would be forwarding to Lefkowitz “our last version of the Non-Prosecut... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 100 | t team with a note stating that it “contains the 18/12 split that Jay and Andy agreed to,” and then to Lefkowitz. Regarding the prosecution of other i... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 105 | he Miami office needed to review it. Villafaña also alerted Lourie that she had spoken that morning to Lefkowitz, who “was waffling” about Epstein ple... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 116 | 90 However, as with Villafaña’s publicly released emails to Lefkowitz, this meeting between Acosta and Lefkowitz drew criticism when the media learned... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 117 | sleading. Emails show that, immediately after the breakfast, Acosta phoned Sloman, who then emailed to Lefkowitz a revision to the Addendum language t... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 119 | epresentative] at this point. Notwithstanding Acosta’s assessment and prediction, after Sloman sent to Lefkowitz a new draft addendum and they spoke b... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 120 | when he sought and obtained a plea hearing postponement from October 26 to November 20. Responding to Lefkowitz’s attempts to limit the USAO’s communi... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 125 | eed to meet with Starr and other Epstein defense attorneys to discuss the defense complaints raised in Lefkowitz’s December 11, 2007 submissions.156 T... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 132 | defense objected to USAO communications with the state authorities. In November 2007, Sloman noted to Lefkowitz, “Your recent correspondence attemptin... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 133 | Whitley. Meanwhile, Oosterbaan’s Deputy Chief drafted a decision letter to be sent from Oosterbaan to Lefkowitz, and over the course of several weeks,... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 139 | d. 178 Sloman provided a draft of this letter to Acosta for his approval before the letter was sent to Lefkowitz. |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 187 | y were scheduling the meeting. Shortly after the breakfast meeting, Sloman, in Miami, sent an email to Lefkowitz (copying Acosta and Villafaña), notin... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 188 | ta said during the breakfast meeting. Although OPR could not find evidence that the letter was sent to Lefkowitz, OPR nonetheless considers it persuas... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 189 | ommunications, and consequently they did not reflect the full context of Villafaña’s communications to Lefkowitz. The redacted emails were later unsea... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 237 | ants and their respective counsel in this matter.”307 Shortly thereafter, Sloman drafted a response to Lefkowitz’s letter, which Acosta revised to cla... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 239 | encing or to provide a written statement for such a proceeding. In a November 30, 2007 reply letter to Lefkowitz, Acosta did not address the substance... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 240 | iscuss this matter with Assistant Attorney General Fisher.” The following day, Sloman sent a letter to Lefkowitz, with copies to Acosta and Villafaña,... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 242 | , state court proceeding involving the entry of a plea on state charges. In a letter from Villafaña to Lefkowitz, responding to his allegations that s... |
| 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report.pdf | - | 297 | ot clear that all federal victims would have been allowed to participate in the state plea hearing. In Lefkowitz’s November 29, 2007 letter to Acosta,... |
| 795 (1).pdf | - | 25 | reements containing these charges. For example, in a September 18, 2007, email from AUSA Villafafia to Lefkowitz (attached hereto as Exhibit "H"), she... |
| 795.pdf | - | 25 | reements containing these charges. For example, in a September 18, 2007, email from AUSA Villafafia to Lefkowitz (attached hereto as Exhibit "H"), she... |
| EFTA00009116.pdf | VOL00007 | 46 | can see on 33 that you're not on 20 the response from but instructs to 21 send the proposed letter to Lefkowitz, and -- 22 A Yeah. 23 Q -- I assume th... |